|
| |

Healing & Commitment
September, 2001
In Mark’s Gospel, chapter 9, verse 40, Jesus says to his disciples: "For he that
is not against us is on our part". Yet according to Matthew – chapter 12, verse
30 – his words were: "He that is not with me is against me". Was Jesus
misquoted? Did his disciples in this – as in so many other things –
misunderstand him? Or did he simply change his mind?
Both sayings are, however, present in Luke. The words "he
that is not against us is for us" occur at chapter 9 verse 50, and "he that is
not with me is against me" at chapter 11, verse 23. Luke’s gospel is twenty-four
chapters in length, yet only seventy-six verses separate these two sentences.
What has happened to change things? The intervening text contains several
passages, two of which we have heard this evening. The reading from Matthew
tells us about the commissioning of the twelve, but that of the seventy, related
by Luke, is remarkably similar – the disciples are commanded to heal as well as
preach the Good News. The parable of the Good Samaritan is preceded by the two
great commandments. As we have been reminded by the first two readings (Deut 6:
3-12 & Lev 19:15-18), Jesus did not invent these, but drew them – as he
invariably did – from the Old Testament. He did however insist that "on these
two commandments hang all the law and the prophets" (Mat 22:40). There are
several other stories in the intervening text: that of Martha and Mary, and
Jesus instructing his disciples in the way they were to pray the "Lord’s
Prayer". But there is something else. Chapter 9, verse 51, records that Jesus:
"steadfastly set his face to go to Jerusalem". Effective ministry always comes
at a cost.
Just over five years ago, I went through what I can only
describe as a time of spiritual testing. I became deeply troubled, and my mind
gave me no rest at day or night. The experience was manifested in an intense
intellectual battle over the nature and - ultimately - the very reality of God.
The debate that raged might be summarised as "What kind of God did I believe in
- and could such a God make any sense? Could the "coincidences" that are typical
of God’s way be in fact just that – coincidences? I was wracked both
intellectually an emotionally by this battle – I can remember actually chewing
the bedclothes one night through fear that I might be living under an illusion.
I found myself wondering in part whether our deep need for a real God might lead
us to want to believe so much that we come to fool ourselves. The whole
experience lasted less than a fortnight, but it seemed to go on forever. Then,
one morning, I found myself in tears of joy as I read my morning prayers. I had
a very real sense that I was back in God’s grip.
Four days later, I went to have my six monthly asthma
check-up. Much to my surprise – and that of the nurse - my peak flow had risen
from 425 to 525, back to where it had been a decade before, and where it has
remained ever since. This, I was told, is very unusual: I had had asthma since I
was since months old, and there is inevitably some deterioration of the lungs
over that period of time. A year before I had been in so bad a state that I had
experienced considerable difficulty in climbing the stairs at work, and had been
advised – very gently – to go home. Five years on, I can state that I have not
had any kind of attack since, and for the past two years have needed no
medication whatsoever.
Experiences of this kind are not uncommon, and in themselves
they never prove that the works of God are being made manifest. It is not
only the spirit of Jesus that is effective in healing people. Indeed, Scripture
warns us that some forms of healing may in fact be the work of the Devil. Yet my
tears were accompanied by a very clear feeling of being loved, and in the
ensuing days and weeks, I found myself extending that love both to God – in
thanks and praise - and to those around me, in a way I had not felt able to do
before. As the passages we have heard from both the Old and the New Testament
remind us, it is the ability to love God and our neighbour – without any
partiality - that characterises the indwelling spirit of Jesus Christ.
What then, of our own commitment? Are we for Jesus or against
him? Each of his two statements takes place within the context of the casting
out of devils. Those who are "not against" him are still calling for deliverance
in his name. The disciples are only upset that it is someone other than
themselves! Those who are recorded as not being for him are, however, casting
out devils by Beezlebub: they are very clearly against him. We may have
reservations about the process of deliverance - although there is considerable
documentation to support it – but in this, along with other ministries, we do
need to acknowledge the centrality of Jesus, whose own work was performed for
the greater glorification of God. The theologian Hans Kung has written that it
is the person "who truly submits in faith", to the message and thus to
God and his Christ who receives the Holy Spirit" (On Being a Christian, p
471). Without the power of the spirit, both effective ministry and effective
healing will be impossible.
The way of discipleship includes healing as well as
preaching. Yet we do not gain people for Jesus by coercion: we gain them through
love. And to love people means to suffer with them. And sometimes to go with
them through hostile territory, as the Samaritan did with the wounded man. It
often seems too much for us: indeed it is impossible without prayer. A wise nun
once said that the only measure of a successful prayer life was one’s increased
capacity to bear suffering. And prayer is also self-surrender – the way in which
we listen for God, and try to respond to his will for us, wherever that may lead
us. In his second letter to the Corinthians, St Paul relates how he asked the
Lord three times to remove the "thorn in his flesh", but was told that: "My
grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness". Paul
responds to this by saying: "Most gladly therefore will I rather glory in my
infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. Therefore I take
pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in necessities, in persecutions, in
distresses for Christ's sake: for when I am weak, then am I strong" (2 Cor
12:9-10). It is one of his most important insights, and reminds us yet again of
the necessity for an effective focus on Jesus, and commitment to his way
in all that we say and do.
None of us know if or when we will be called on to set our
faces to go to our own Jerusalem, but it is always a possibility so long as our
hearts are open to it. At that stage we shall need to be clear on our priorities
and be willing to set aside those things that are likely to get in the way or
hinder our journey. That may well include some human relationships, for
Jesus tells us – a little later on in Luke - that "If any man come to me, and
hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and
sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple". Harsh words, but
the person speaking them represents absolute love – that which transcends the
network of social and family responsibilities. "He that is not with me is
against me".
All real healing is going to cost us something. Ultimately,
it means nothing less than achieving the re-alignment of a divided humanity with
its creator and sustainer; and that includes a divided Church. In the raising of
Lazarus, Jesus groans (John 11:33), his agony prefiguring that in Gethsemane and
on the cross. Yet his call, with all that it demands of us, can also bring great
joy. Christian healing is not some abstract, clinical ritual, but is grounded in
the love that derives from the deepest kind of relationship. St John relates how
the sisters of Lazarus fully understand this, as they send for Jesus "saying,
Lord, behold, he whom thou lovest is sick" (v 3). When Jesus arrives he finds
"Mary weeping, and the Jews also weeping which came with her. (v 33). Then he
wept, and the Jews said, "Behold how he loved him!" (v 36). Jesus’s emotions
after Lazarus is raised are not recorded by the Evangelist, but they can be
guessed at from the account of another, who "ran and fell on his neck, and
kissed him, and said to his servants, bring forth the best robe, and put it on
him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet: and bring hither the
fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be merry: For this my son was
dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found". (Lk 15:20-24).
Neil Macdonald
|